New bill launched
Home > FAQs
Search

Yellowcard

Donate your body for research

Resources
 

Didn't all Nobel Prize winners in Medicine and Physiology experiment on animals?

Yes, most did. But it doesn't follow that the discoveries would not have occurred without animals. It only means that the market for lab animals was thriving and accessible.

From the second half of the 19th century onward, experimenting on animals became part of all medical curricula. Therefore researchers were obliged to perform animal experiments to earn their degrees.

In the instances wherein animals were used for the Nobel Prize-winning results, they were not necessary. Though animal tissue research was the convention, human tissue was available and more viable - as many Nobel Prize winners have since remarked.

  The discovery of the DNA double helix, arguably the 20th Century's most important medical breakthrough, would have been impossible without the non-animal methods of technology and in vitro research.

Next Question

 

 

 

 

 

We owe our ability to view the heart's blood vessels to German urologist, Werner Theodor Otto Forssmann - a physician who experimented on himself! After sliding a catheter into his arm and taking x-rays, Forssmann showed the catheter could be threaded to the heart without problem. He had tried the procedure on rabbits, but they had all died from irregular heartbeats when the catheter reached their hearts. The doctor's distrust of the animal results enabled modern medicine to monitor the vessels, alert physicians to problems, and prevent an oncoming stroke or heart attack.

Safer Medicines Campaign
PO Box 62720, London SW2 9FQ
Tel: 020 8265 2880 Email: info@safermedicines.org
[sitemap]