How did animal experimentation
become so established to begin with?
There have always existed abundant human bodies,
tissue, and blood to augment our knowledge base.
But when western Catholicism prevailed, papal
decree forbade autopsy. In the second century
AD, a Roman physician named Galen performed endless
animal experiments and generated over 500 treatises
on animal physiology.
Galen's false hypotheses - declaring that animals
possess the same physiology as humans - helped
dim the light throughout the Dark Ages, but the
Renaissance offered a slight reprieve. When competitive
intellectual inquiry overwhelmed Church injunctions,
autopsies revealed animal-based inaccuracies
and shed light on the true nature of human disease.
In the 1600s - 1800s, when so little was known
about physiology, one could learn basic things
from animals, because all mammals have things
in common at the gross level: they all have hearts,
lungs and livers, for example. Today, our studies
are at the molecular level precisely where the
differences between species are greatest. In
the mid 19th century, Claude Bernard took up
animal experimentation. His tremendous zeal and
proliferation of data created a market for animal
experimentation.
"From a history of misconceptions..."
In the 1930s, a disaster over ethylene glycol
poisoning established animal testing as routine
in drug development. The disaster of thalidomide,
a drug for morning sickness that led to over
10,000 babies with birth defects, spurred governments
to mandate animal testing as a supposed guarantee
of drug safety. Never mind that animal tests
had failed to predict the thalidomide tragedy
itself. [30]
Next Question |